[2026:RJ-JP:24322] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8808/2026 URN: CRLMB / 16142U / 2026 Bharathari S/o Shri Malkhan Singh, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Buteri, Tehsil Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror (Rajasthan). (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Behror) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9248/2026 URN: CRLMB / 16970U / 2026 Ankush S/o Ravindra Kumar, Age 21 Years, R/o Naisarana, Police Station Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Behror) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohit Balwada with Mr. Aditya Raj Mr. Vikash Kumar Jakhar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 01/07/2026 1. These instant bail applications have been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 122/2026 registered at Police Station Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror for the offence(s) punishable under Sections [2026:RJ-JP:24322] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8808/2026] 109(1), 189(2), 324(4) & 126(2) of BNS and under Sections 5 & 27 of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. He also submit that the accused-petitioners are in custody since long; that accused-petitioners are not required for further investigation. He further submits that injury sustained by the injured is not attributed to accused-petitioners; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the accused- petitioners hereinabove but concurs with the fact that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioners. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and the material available before the Court, it is reflected that accused-petitioners are not required for further investigation; that injury sustained by the injured is not attributed to accused-petitioners; ]that accused-petitioners Bharathari and Ankush are behind the bars since 20.05.2026 and 17.05.2026 respectively; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners; that trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioners on bail. [2026:RJ-JP:24322] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8808/2026] 5. Therefore, these instant bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners Bharathari S/o Shri Malkhan Singh and Ankush S/o Ravindra Kumar are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 106-107/SHIVANI