Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9296 (AP)

T. Jaya kumar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/36192/2018 · 2026-08-30

V Sujatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010751912018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] MONDAY, THE 31st DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 36192/2018 Between: 1. T. JAYA KUMAR, S/O. T. SIMON, AGE 58 YEARS,OCC. ASST. PHYSICAL DIRECTOR, R/O H.NO. 25-7-1/3, LUTHEREN PETA, NEAR RAVINDRA BHARATHI SCHOOL, PALAKOL, W.G.DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR, A.P. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF A.P, PRASADAM PADU, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE SECRETARY AND CORRESPONDENT, SRI. Y.N.COLLEGE, NARASAPURAM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT- A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue appropriate writ, order or direction, more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not considering the petitioners representations dt.10-12-2010, 5-12-2011, 28-3- 2012 and 15-9-2018 submitted for up-gradation of his post and release of UGC Scales attached to the post as per Government Orders Vide G.O.Ms.No.136 Edn. Dt. 6.4.1995, G.O.Ms.No.126 Edn. Dt. 16.5.1996, G.O. 2 VS,J W.P.No.36192 of 2018 Ms.No. 61. HE dt. 16.7.2001, G.O. Ms.No. 11, HE dt. 20.2.2004, G.O.Ms.No.140 HE dt. 3.10.2005, as illegal , arbitrary, contrary to law and violative of principles of natural justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner representations dt.10-12- 2010, 5-12-2011, 28-3-2014 and 15-9-2018 in the light of the Govt. Orders vide G.O.Ms.No.136 Edn. Dt. 6.4.1995, G.O.Ms.No. 126 Edn. Dt.16.5.1996, G.O.MS.N0.61, HE dt. 16.7.2001, pending disposal of the main writ petition and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim orders granted on 08-10-2018 in I.A.No. 1 of 2018 in WP No. 36192/2018 and dismiss the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KARRA SUDHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following: 3 VS,J W.P.No.36192 of 2018 ORDER: When the writ petition came up for hearing on 26.02.2024 and 11.03.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and as such, the matter was adjourned. Subsequently, when the matter was listed on 17.08.2026, there was no representation on behalf of counsel for the petitioner, as such, the matter was directed to be posted on 31.08.2026 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not evincing any interest in pursuing the matter. In view of the same, this writ petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA 31.08.2026 Gss