HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2369 of 2024 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Heard Sri Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel for applicants, Ms. Kirti Singh, learned counsel for opposite party No.2 and learned AGA for the State. 2. The present application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants with a prayer to quash the charge sheet No.135/23 dated 8.6.2023 and cognizance/summoning order dated 15.9.2023 and entire proceeding of Case No.31109 of 2023 (State Vs. Aman and others) arising out of Case Crime No.10 of 2023, under sections 498-A, 323, 506, 354, 354-B I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, P.S. Binawar, District Badaun. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that applicants and opposite party no.2 have amicably settled their dispute out of the Court. Applicants approached this Court by filing this application with prayer to quash the proceedings on terms of compromise entered between the parties, this Court vide order dated 16.3.2026 directed the parties to appear before the trial court for verification of the parties and compromise application. Trial court vide order dated 3.4.2026 verified the parties as well as compromise application. He further submitted that applicants and opposite party no.2 compromised the matter and opposite party No.2 does not want to proceed the matter against the applicants. He further Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Juned Alam, Pradeep Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Akhilesh, G.A., Kirti Singh Aman And Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) submitted that applicants and opposite party no.2 have settled through compromise their dispute and as such opposite party no.2 does not wish to press the aforesaid case against the applicants. Opposite party no.2 is ready to withdraw the prosecution of the applicants and in view of the compromise, no fruitful purpose would be served if the prosecution is allowed to go on. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.2 does not dispute the correctness of the submission made by learned counsel for the applicants or the correctness of the documents relied upon by him. He submits that opposite party no. 2 has no objection, if the proceedings in the aforesaid case are quashed. 5. Learned AGA submitted that both the parties have settled their dispute out of the court, hence, no reason to proceed further. 6. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Narindra Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Vs. State of Gujarat (2017) 9 SCC, 641, Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303 and State of M.P. Vs. Laxmi Narayanan (2019) 5 SCC 688, wherein Hon'ble Apex Court has categorically held that compromise can be made between the parties even in respect of certain cognizable and non-compoundable offences. Reference may also be made to the decision given by this Court in Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. and another [2013 (83) ACC 278], in which, law expounded by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the aforesaid cases has been explained in detail. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, as noted herein above, and also the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the considered opinion that no useful purpose would be served by prolonging the proceedings of the above mentioned case. 8. Accordingly, the harge sheet No.135/23 dated 8.6.2023 and cognizance/summoning order dated 15.9.2023 and entire proceeding of Case No.31109 of 2023 (State Vs. Aman and others) arising out of Case Crime No.10 of 2023, under sections 498-A, 323, 506, 354, 354-B I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, P.S. Binawar, District Badaun are hereby A482 No. 2369 of 2024 2 quashed. 9. This application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is accordingly allowed. September 18, 2026 Md Faisal A482 No. 2369 of 2024 3 (Chawan Prakash,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD FAISAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad