Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010135522026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3552/2026 MAJIDA BEGUM AND 2 ORS D/O LATE ABDUL KHALEK, R/O PANABARI, PO DHEKIAJULI, PS DHEKIAJULI, DIST SONITPUR, ASSAM- 784110 2: JUSHNARA BEGUM D/O LATE ABDUL KHALEK R/O BALIBARI JOGIPARA PO BALIBARI DARRANG ASSAM- 784146 3: RUKIA KHATUN D/O LATE ABDUL KHALEK R/O 148 GENDHUA ROAD NEAR SCHOOL GENDHUA PATHER PO HATIJUJUA NAGAON ASSAM PIN 78212 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GHY- 06, ASSAM 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DISPUR Page No.# 2/4 GUWAHATI- 06 ASSAM 3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER SONITPUR ASSAM MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD MAHABHAIRAB TEZPUR PIN- 784001 4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER DHEKIAJULI ASSAM PO DHEKIAJULI SONITPUR 784110 ASSAM 5:JALIL SEKH S/O LATE ABDUL KHALEK R/O WARD NO 5 PO DHEKIAJULI P.S. DHEKIAJULI DHEKIAJULI SONITPUR ASSAM 784110 6:MATIUR SEKH S/O LATE ABDUL KHALEK R/O WARD NO 5 PO DHEKIAJULI PS DHEKIAJULI DHEKIAJULI SONITPUR ASSAM 784110 7:MUBARAQUE SEKH S/O LATE ABDUL KHALEK R/O WARD NO 5 PO DHEKIAJULI PS DHEKIAJULI DHEKIAJULI SONITPUR ASSAM 784110 Page No.# 3/4 8:FARUK SEKH S/O LATE ABDUL KHALEK R/O WARD NO 5 PO DHEKIAJULI PS DHEKIAJULI DHEKIAJULI SONITPUR ASSAM 78411 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR P R SARMA, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, REVENUE BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 13-07-2026 Heard Mr. P.R. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioners; Mr. H. Sarma, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 1, 3 & 4; and Ms. N. Bordoloi, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department for the respondent no. 2. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties at some length, Mr. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to file afresh with better particulars. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as prayed for. JUDGE Page No.# 4/4 Comparing Assistant