[2026:RJ-JP:11371] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 210/2026 Imran Pinara S/o Taj Mohammed @ Tajuddin Masuri, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Indra Colony, Devliya Kalan, Police Station Bhinai, District Ajmer. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Hanuman S/o Polu, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ekalsiknha, Bhinai, Ajmer. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 211/2026 Pawan Meghwanshi S/o Jasraj Meghwanshi, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Chamoro Ka Mohalla, Devliya Kalan, Police Station Bhinai, District Ajmer. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer) ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Hanuman S/o Polu, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ekalsingha, Bhinai, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Aayush Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, P.P. with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 17/03/2026 1. The present criminal appeals have been filed under Section 14 A (2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act by accused- [2026:RJ-JP:11371] (2 of 4) [CRLAS-210/2026] appellants- Imran Pinara S/o Taj Mohammad @ Tajuddin Mansuri and Pawan Meghwanshi S/o Jasraj Meghwanshi being aggrieved with the order dated 20.01.2026 passed by Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Ajmer in Criminal Misc. Case Nos. 83/2026 and 82/2026 respectively, whereby the trial court has dismissed the bail application field on behalf of the appellant in connection with FIR No. 293/2025 dated 07.12.2025 registered at Police Station Bhinai, District Ajmer for offence under Sections 189(2), 351(2), 352 and 111(2) (a) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the appellants have been arrested in connection with the impugned FIR on the allegation that they opened fire upon the complainant. Learned counsel further submitted that the entire case is false and baseless as police registered three FIRs at the same police station bearing Nos.292/2025 and 294/2025 on the same day. Learned counsel further submitted that, as pointed out by the Investigating Officer present before this Court, the allegations in all the three FIRs is that a firearm was used and, therefore, the FIRs were registered against the appellant. Learned counsel further submitted that, apart from these three FIRs dated 07.12.2025, the appellants have one criminal case under Section RNC Act of the year 2022 and one more case under the Arms Act of the year 2022 and, thereafter, there are no criminal antecedents of any nature and all of a sudden three FIRs have registered on the same day. In view thereof, learned counsel for the appellants prayed that the appellants be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposed the criminal appeals and submitted that the complainant has been informed [2026:RJ-JP:11371] (3 of 4) [CRLAS-210/2026] about the criminal appeal, despite service, none appeared on behalf of the complainant. 4. This Court called the Investigation Officer to inquire as to how three FIRs were registered one after and the other on the same day. The Investigating Officer informed that the appellants used a firearm at three places namely i.e. Vishrambari, Ekalsingha and Rohillakalla and, therefore, three FIRs were registered. On further querry of this Court as to what was recovered from all the three places, the Investigating Officer informed that one round was recovered at the first place namely Vishrambari, for which the FIR bearing No.292/2025 was registered, however, no bullet or other incriminating material was recovered at the other two places for which the FIRs bearing Nos. 292/2025 and 294/2025 were registered under the Arms Act. This Court while interacting with the Investigating Officer and hearing the learned Public Prosecutor, noted that no recovery of firearm, bullet etc. has been made from the alleged two places and casually three FIRs were registered. This appears to be doubtful, however, as the investigating is pending, this Court was not like to make any comment of this case. 5. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the fact that no specific act has been assigned to the appellant and the trial of the case will take long time, this Court is inclined to exercise its power under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-appellants - Imran Pinara S/o Taj Mohammed @ Tajuddin Masuri and Pawan Meghwanshi S/o Jasraj Meghwanshi on bail. [2026:RJ-JP:11371] (4 of 4) [CRLAS-210/2026] 6. Accordingly, these present appeals have been filed under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, are allowed and it is directed that appellants- Imran Pinara S/o Taj Mohammed @ Tajuddin Masuri and Pawan Meghwanshi S/o Jasraj Meghwanshi shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No. 293/2025 dated 07.12.2025 registered at Police Station Bhinai, District Ajmer, provided each of them executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/ each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for their appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The appellants are further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the appeal will not affect the trial of the case. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J 142-143 - RAVI KHANDELWAL