Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9288 (JHR)

VIVEK KUMAR ALIAS VIVEK KUMAR CHANDRAVANSHI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3562/2025 · 2026-01-19

Gautam Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:1349 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3562 of 2025 ------ Vivek Kumar @ Vivek Kumar Chandravanshi, son of Late Sunil Ram, resident of At Jail Hata Mohalla, P.O. and P.S. Daltonganj, District Palamau, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Sheo Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, A.P.P. ------ Order No.04 / Dated : 19.01.2026 Bail petition filed on behalf of the petitioner- Vivek Kumar @ Vivek Kumar Chandravanshi, who is in custody since 10.07.2024 in connection with Jagarnathpur P.S. Case No. 291 of 2024 for the offence registered under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Ranchi, is pressed into motion. It is submitted by the learned counsel on behalf of petitioner that he is not named in the FIR and there is no material against him except confessional statement of the co-accused. Similarly situated co-accused persons have been granted bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Learned A.P.P. opposed the bail petition. It is submitted that the matter involves robbery in the jewelry shop by using fire arm. The petitioner was put on TIP and has been identified. Petitioner has criminal antecedents being involved in eighteen cases. Under the circumstance, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner, is hereby, rejected. (Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Anit Uploaded 20.01.2026