HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30488 of 2026 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vijay Pratap Singh, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the state-respondents. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondent nos. 2 and 3 to decide the representation of the petitioner with regard to his peaceful possession as per the residential lease dated 25.11.1973." 3. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that agricultural allotment was made in favour of petitioner's father in respect to the plot which was recorded as banjar in the revenue records. He submitted that petitioner came in possession of the said plot but the name of the petitioner's father has not been recorded over the plot in question on the basis of allotment, as such, the authorities have started interference with the right of the petitioner. He submitted that petitioner has filed application/representation before the Sub Divisional Officer, Sikandrabad, Bulandshahar with the prayer that revenue authorities should demarcate the plot in question and provide passage to the petitioner in respect to the allotment made in favour of petitioner. He submitted that the Sub Divisional Officer be directed to consider the petitioner's application/representation dated 14.11.2025 within a time bound Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajeet Kumar Yadav, Chandra Shekher Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Kailash .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) period. 4. On the other hand, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the state- respondents submitted that no interference is required in the matter as petitioner has not been recorded over the plot in question rather the plot in question is recorded as banjar. 5. I have considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 6. The prayer made in the instant writ petition for mandamus, cannot be entertained in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 7. No interference is required in the matter. 8. The writ petition is dismissed. September 21, 2026 C.Prakash WRIC No. 30488 of 2026 2 (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad