[2026:RJ-JP:24432] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6201/2026 URN: CRLMB / 11094U / 2026 Vijendra @ Virju @ Viju Dilan S/o Rishpal Jat, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Nithara, Police Station Shahpura, District Jaipur (Raj.) (Petitioner At Present Confined In District Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9015/2026 URN: CRLMB / 16532U / 2026 Manoj Gurjar S/o Shri Shyo Prasad Gurjar, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Magra Ki Dhani, Tan Lakher, Police Station Chandwaji, District Jaipur Rural (Raj.) (Presently Accused Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Gadwal Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Mr. Rajesh Swami Mr. Sitaram Samota For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 02/07/2026 1. The petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.9/2026 registered at Police Station Raisar, District Jaipur Rural for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 307, 351(2) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023. [2026:RJ-JP:24432] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6201/2026] 2. Since both these bail applications arise out of common FIR, hence, they are being decided by this common order. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. It is further submitted that the petitioners are facing allegations of committing theft of ₹7,000/- in cash and a mobile phone belonging to the complainant. However, nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of either of the petitioners. It is further submitted that no medical examination of the complainant was conducted in connection with the alleged incident. The petitioners have been in judicial custody since 30.03.2026. It is further submitted that, though six criminal antecedents have been reported against petitioner No.1, Vijendra @ Virju @ Viju Dilan, he has been granted bail in all those cases. Likewise, one criminal antecedent has been reported against petitioner No.2, Manoj Gurjar, and he has also been granted bail in the said case. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, consequently, the bail applications deserves to be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications of the petitioners. 6. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any [2026:RJ-JP:24432] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6201/2026] opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Consequently, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Vijendra @ Virju @ Viju Dilan S/o Rishpal Jat and Manoj Gurjar S/o Shri Shyo Prasad Gurjar, be released on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that each of them shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 22-23/Arun