ALAUDDIN SHEKH ALIAS BHOLA ALLIAS ALAUDDIN SK v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./840/2026 · 2026-02-26
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9276 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9276 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:5705 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 840 of 2026 --------- Alauddin Shekh @ Bhola @ Alauddin SK @ Alauddin, aged about 34 years, S/o-Lt. Nasiruddin @ Nasiddin Shekh @ Nasiddin, R/o-Vill.-Jankinagar, P.O.-Pakur, P.S.-Pakur(Muffasil), Dist.-Pakur, Jharkhand
… … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand
…. Respondent --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate
Mr. Yuvraj Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vijoy Kumar Sinha, A.P.P.
----------- 02/Dated: 26th February, 2026
1. Heard Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P.
2. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Pakur(Town) P.S. Case No. 288 of 2025 registered under sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of Arms Act. 3. As per allegation in the FIR, the informant, Officer-in-Charge of Pakur(town) P.S. proceeded for investigation in connection with Pakur (Town) P.S. Case No.275 of 2025, in that course the petitioner is alleged to have been arrested along with a country made pistol and the present case has been lodged. 4. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence at all rather he has been falsely implicated in this case without any rhyme and reasons. Learned counsel further submits that except one case i.e., Pakur (Town) P.S. Case No.275 of 2025, which was being investigated by Officer-in-Charge of Pakur (Town) P.S., there is no other case pending against the petitioner. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 14.11.2025 without any
( 2026:JHHC:5705 )
2
rhymes and reasons. Petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and remain physically present on each and every date till the conclusion of the trial and shall not indulge in tampering with the prosecution evidence or influence the witnesses or gain over them. Hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 5. Learned Addl. P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the nature of allegation against petitioner coupled with materials available on record, I am inclined to release the above named petitioner, on bail.
Accordingly, the petitioner named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pakur in connection with Pakur(Town) P.S. Case No. 288 of 2025 with condition that petitioner shall appear physically on each and every date during the trial of case till its conclusion unless his physical appearance is dispensed with for sufficient cause to the satisfaction of the learned trial court and with further condition that petitioner shall not indulge in tampering with the prosecution evidence or influence the witnesses or gain over them. (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) Pappu/- 26/02/2026