Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9276 (CAL)

BRATATI MAJUMDER v. RANDHIR KUMAR DIRECTORATE OF PPF AND GROUP INS AND ANR

WPCRC/39/2026 · 2026-04-10

Rajasekhar Mantha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

10.04.2026 Court No.13 Item No.3 AP WPCRC 39 of 2026 In WPA 3150 of 2024 Bratati Majumder Vs. Mr. Randhir Kumar, Directorate of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance and Ors. Ms. Sabita Khutia (Bhunya) Mr. Krishnapada Santra ... For the Petitioner. Mr. Bhaskar Prosad Vaisya Mr. Nilay Baran Mondal. …For the alleged contemnor No.1. Mr. K.J. Yusuf Mr. Parikshit Goswami …For the alleged contemnor No.2. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order in question has been complied with. 2. Therefore, nothing further remains to be adjudicated in the contempt application. 3. Hence, the contempt application is disposed of. 4. Personal presence of the alleged contemnors, if any, is dispensed with. 5. Rule, if any, shall stand discharged. 6. There shall be no order as to costs. 7. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Rajasekhar Mantha, J.)