M/s. Sai Lakshmi Tulasi Ferros Pvt. Ltd., v. The Southern Power Distribution Company of A.P. Limited,
WP/38459/2015 · 2026-09-07
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9274 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9274 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010755032015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY, THE 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 38459/2015 Between:
1. M/S. SAI LAKSHMI TULASI FERROS PVT. LTD.,, PLOT NO.1537 & 538, IGC, ARC, GUNDLAPALLY VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, A. LEELA MADHAVI,
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A P LIMITED, (APSPDCL) REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 2. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER FINANCE, THE SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P. LIMITED, (APSPDCL) TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, OPERATION CIRCLE, THE SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P. LIMITED, (APSPDCL), PRAKASHAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 4. THE SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICER, OPERATION CIRCLE, THE SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P. LIMITED, (APSPDCL), PRAKASHAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. ...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ or order of direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in levying and demanding deemed energy charges for the period from 09.06.2011 to 11.09.2012 as highly illegal, arbitrary, irrational, unjust, opposed to the Principles of Natural Justice and contrary to Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2013 and also violate of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 265 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the letter No. SE.O.OG.SAO.JAO.HT.D.No. 488/2014 dated 18.10.2014 of the 3rd respondent in so far as levy and demand of Deemed Energy charges from the petitioner for the period from 09.06.2011 to 11.09.2012 is concerned and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 49509 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the levy and the collection of the deemed energy charges for the period from 09.06.2011 to 11.09.2012 including disconnection of petitioner's power supply pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. D V NAGARJUNA BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL)
2.
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO.38459 OF 2015
ORDER:
1. Smt. Vijaya Durga Ogur, learned counsel representing on behalf of Sri D.V. Nagarajun Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner on record submits that the cause in the present writ petition no longer survives for adjudication by this Court. 2. In view of the submission by the learned counsel for the petitioner, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. 3. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stand dismissed. ______________________________________ JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA Date: 08-09-2026
BSM
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO.38459 OF 2015
Date 08-09-2026
W
BSM