AMIT KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/38031/2025 · 2026-09-17
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9274 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9274 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 38031 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.
Learned counsel for the applicants is permitted to correct the prayer clause during the course of the day. Heard Shri Veer Singh, learned counsel for the applicants, Shri Ramesh Kumar,
learned counsel private opposite party no.2 and Ms. Saumya Madhyan, brief holder for the State. The present application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Session Trial No. 2029 of 2025, arising out of Case Crime No. 514 of 2024, under Sections 103(1), 238, 140(1) of B.N.S., Police Station - Dhampur, District- Bijnor, pending in the Court of Additional Session Judge/Special Judge (E.C. Act), Bijnor. Learned A.G.A. pointed out that statement of four fact witnesses have been recorded before the trial Court and the trial is an advance stage. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant does not want to press the present application. In view of above, the present application is dismissed as not pressed. September 18, 2026 VS Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manoj Kumar Gautam, Veer Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ramesh Kumar (Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.) Amit Kumar And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR BARATAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad