Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9273 (CHH)

VIKAS SONI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/3743/2026 · 2026-04-29

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 1 2026:CGHC:20076 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3743 of 2026 • Vikas Soni S/o Prahalad Soni Aged About 33 Years R/o Newra Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Forest Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Principal Chief Conservator Of Forest Aranya Bhawan, Medical College Road, Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Chief Conservator Of Forest Forest Circle- Bilaspur, Distt- Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. The Divisional Forest Officer Forest Division, Bilaspur Distt- Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. Forest Range Officer Forest Range- Takhatpur, Distt- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Shubham Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 30/04/2026 1. On the objection being raised by learned counsel for the respondents-State that the petitioner is having efficacious alternate remedy to challenge the order Annexure P-1, after arguing for some time, learned counsel for petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to avail other alternate remedy available to him under the law. 2. In view of above submission made by learned counsel for the respective parties, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) pwn JUDGE PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA