APHC010689642015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY, THE 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 41913/2015 Between: 1. A.P. POWER GENERATING EMPLOYEES UNION, REGISTRATION NO.E-1535, REP. BY ITS REGIONAL SECRETARY N.RAMANAIAH, DT 1 & 2, RTPP, V.V.REDDY NAGAR, KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE AP GENCO, REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR (HR), AP GENCO, VIDYUTH SOUDHA, SOMAJIGUDA, KHAIRATABAD, HYDERABAD. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER O AND M, RAYALASEEMA THERMAL POWER PROJECT, V.V.REDDY NAGAR, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, CIRCLE CIRCLE-II, RTPP, V.V.REDDY NAGAR, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ or order, orders or directions more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus - i) declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in asking the petitioner to return one of the quarters (either DT-1 or DT-2) allotted to the petitioner's trade union vide Lr.No.SE/CC- II/RTPP/Tech-3/F.(Otrs Surren)/D.No.3300/15, dt.09-12-2015 as illegal, arbitrary, discriminative, unjust, mala fide, non application of mind, extraneous considerations, contrary to the 'doctrine of legitimate expectation' and 2 'doctrone of promissory estoppel', misfeasance, malfeasance, nonfeasance, colorable exercise of powers and also contrary to the letter and spirit of the provisions of the Trade Union Act besides violative of the Arts.14 & 16 of the Constitution of India; and ii) consequently, set aside the same and also direct the 3rd respondent to allow the petitioner's trade union to be continued in Quarter Nos.DT-1 & 2 as per the allotment vide Proc.No.Se/CC- II/RTPP/T/F/D.No.2997/15, dt.10-11-2015 of the 3rd respondent; and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 54050 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Lr.No.SE/CC-II/RTPP/Tech-3/F.(Otrs Sureen)/D.No.3300/15, dt.09-12-2015 issued by the 3rd respondent and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PEETA RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 2. K.KRISHNABUSHAN CHOWDARY SC For APGENCO 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO.41913 OF 2015 ORDER: 1. Sri Peeta Raman, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stand dismissed. ______________________________________ JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA Date: 08-09-2026 BSM 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO.41913 OF 2015 Date 08-09-2026 W BSM