Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9272 (ALL)

MRITYUNJAY RAJBHAR v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/21226/2026 · 2026-09-20

Krishan Pahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 21226 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sr. No.113 out of 131) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Jitendra Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri R.P. Patel, learned State Law Officer for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. By means of the present bail application, the applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.38 of 2026, under Section 3(1) of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station- Ranipur, District- Mau, during the pendency of trial. 4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the prosecution under the Gangsters Act have been launched against the applicant on the basis of one criminal case shown in the gang chart in which he has already been enlarged on bail by the court concerned. The detail of criminal case has been mentioned in the affidavit accompanying the bail application. He has been falsely implicated in the present case due to police rivalry. He is not the member of any gang. The criminal history of five cases assigned to the applicant stands explained. The applicant is languishing in jail since 08.04.2026. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. On the other hand, learned State Law Officer opposed the prayer for bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jitendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mrityunjay Rajbhar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant- Mrityunjay Rajbhar, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 7. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. September 21, 2026 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 21226 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad