1 901 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 121 OF 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 901 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 121 OF 2011 IN WP/6710/2009 NAGORAO SAKHARAM JAGTAP AND ORS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ... Adv. Devidas B. Dangode h/f Adv. D. R. Jayabhar, Advocate for the Petitioner Adv. A. S. Shinde, AGP for Respondents-State ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 11/09/2026 ORDER ( Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J. ) :- . In the order under contempt, the respondents were directed to decide the petitioners' application for rental compensation. 2. The affidavit-in-reply is filed by respondent Nos. 2 and 3, wherein it is stated that by order dated 05.07.2011, the application of the petitioners was decided. 3. As such, the order under contempt is complied with and the petition stands disposed of. ( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) shivani/ 2026:BHC-AUG:42528