KUNWAR VIKASH SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/40101/2026 · 2026-09-21
Chawan Prakash
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9268 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9268 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 40101 of 2026 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J.
1. Heard Sri Ankit Kapoor, learned counsel for applicants and learned AGA for the State. 2. The present application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the applicants with a prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 19-04-2019 and entire Criminal proceedings of Criminal Case No. 419 of 2019 (State Vs. Kunwar Vikash Singh & Ors), arising out of Case Crime No.372 of 2018, under sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 377 of I.P.C. and section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in respect to the applicant no.1 and under sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in respect to the applicant no. 2 and under section 498-A, 323, 504, 506, 354, 376 I.P.C. and section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in respect to the applicant no. 3, P.S.-Bhelupur, District-Varanasi, pending in the court Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate III. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that applicants and opposite party no.2 have amicably settled their dispute out of the Court. Applicants approached this Court by filing this application with prayer to quash the proceedings on terms of compromise entered between the parties, this Court vide order dated 3.7.2026 passed in Application U/S 528 BNSS No.20247 of 2026, directed the parties to appear before the trial court for verification of the parties and compromise application. Trial court vide order dated 30.7.2026 verified the parties as well as compromise application. He further submitted that applicants and opposite party no.2 compromised the matter and opposite party No.2 does Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ankit Kapoor Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Kunwar Vikash Singh And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
not want to proceed the matter against the applicants. He further submitted that applicants and opposite party no.2 have settled through compromise their dispute and as such opposite party no.2 does not wish to press the aforesaid case against the applicants. Opposite party no.2 is ready to withdraw the prosecution of the applicants and in view of the compromise, no fruitful purpose would be served if the prosecution is allowed to go on. 4.
Learned AGA does not dispute the correctness of the submission made by learned counsel for the applicants or the correctness of the documents relied upon by him. He submits that he has no objection, if the proceedings in the aforesaid case are quashed. 5. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Narindra Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Vs. State of Gujarat (2017) 9 SCC, 641, Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303 and State of M.P. Vs. Laxmi Narayanan (2019) 5 SCC 688, wherein Hon'ble Apex Court has categorically held that compromise can be made between the parties even in respect of certain cognizable and non-compoundable offences. Reference may also be made to the decision given by this Court in Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. and another [2013 (83) ACC 278], in which, law expounded by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the aforesaid cases has been explained in detail. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, as noted herein above, and also the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the considered opinion that no useful purpose would be served by prolonging the proceedings of the above mentioned case. 7. Accordingly, the charge sheet dated 19-04-2019 and entire Criminal proceedings of Criminal Case No. 419 of 2019 (State Vs. Kunwar Vikash Singh & Ors), arising out of Case Crime No.372 of 2018, under sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 377 of I.P.C. and section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in respect to the applicant no.1 and under sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in respect to the applicant no. 2 and under section 498-A, 323, 504, 506, 354, 376 I.P.C. and section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in respect to NA528 No. 40101 of 2026 2
the applicant no. 3, P.S.-Bhelupur, District-Varanasi are hereby quashed. 8.
This application under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. is accordingly allowed. September 22, 2026 Md Faisal NA528 No. 40101 of 2026 3 (Chawan Prakash,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD FAISAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad