Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9265 (JHR)

BIRENDRA KUMAR DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./9154/2025 · 2026-02-18

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:4668 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9154 of 2025 ----- Birendra Kumar Das, S/o Kartik Ravidas, R/o Village- Basariya, P.O. and P.s. Barkatha, District- Hazaribag .... Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party(s). ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhay Kumar Chaturvedi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Nawin Kumar Singh, Addl. P.P. …...... 09/18.02.2026: This bail application has been filed under Sections 483 & 484 of BNSS, 2023 wherein, prayer has been made for grant of bail as he is in custody for allegedly committing offence punishable under Sections 303(2), 140(1), 64 and 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 2. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner learned counsel for the State and have also gone through the impugned order. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no material against the petitioner, further there is no eye witness to the said occurrence. He submits that the allegation of rape is also false. He further submits that as per the First Information Report what is the source of the information that this petitioner has committed murder has also not been disclosed. He further submits that important witnesses have been examined in this case, but no one has implicated this petitioner. 4. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. 5. After hearing the parties and after going through the record, I find that there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he has kidnapped the deceased and after commission of rape, committed the murder. The petitioner was arrested and he has given his confessional statement. Though the confessional statement itself has got no evidentiary value, but the fact remains that his wearing apparels were seized where the blood stains were found and the stick which was used for assault was also seized and the DNA and the blood samples were sent for FSL. In the FSL report, it is concluded that the DNA profile generated from blood found in the jeans cutting is a mixed DNA profile from human male and female sources of origin. Further, the DNA profile generated from the blood found in the wooden piece is from one human female source of origin, which is found to be present in the mixed DNA profile generated from the blood found in the jeans cutting. 6. Considering the above fact and the fact that the trial is in progress, I am not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with S.T. No.102 of 2025, pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Chatra stands rejected. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 18th February, 2026 R.S./ Uploaded on 21/02/2026