SURESH KUMAR @ SURESH KUMAR JAISWAL AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS
WRIC/37750/2026 · 2026-09-20
Ajit Kumar, Garima Prashad
Original Suitbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9261 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9261 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 37750 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. Petitioners want enforcement of the order of temporary injunction passed by the Civil Judge (J.D.), District - Prayagraj in O.S. No.- 1752 of 2026.
3. In our considered view, if petitioners are aggrieved from violation of order of temporary injunction he has alternative efficacious remedy to move miscellaneous application under Order 39 Rule 2-A of Code of Civil Procedure and from pleadings it is apparent that petitioner has already filed such a misc. application. However, we still provide that after getting the spot survey of the suit property done by Amin Commissioner within four weeks and then the application under Order 39 Rule 2-A of Code of Civil Procedure shall be disposed of in accordance with law. We also direct the district and police administration not to interfere in the civil dispute inter se parties except in the event there is any law and order situation.
4. With the aforesaid liberty, this petition is consigned to records. September 21, 2026 A.K.Srivastava Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jeeshan Ahmad Siddiqui, Kanhaiya Lal, Mohammed Iftekhar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Suresh Kumar @ Suresh Kumar Jaiswal And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad