Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9254 (RAJ)

RADHAKISHAN MEGHWANSHI SON OF SHRI BHAGWANA RAM MEGHWANSHI v. RAJASTHAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

SAW/773/2025 · 2026-06-29

Maneesh Sharma, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:23688-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 773/2025 URN: SAW / 1652U / 2025 Radhakishan Meghwanshi Son Of Shri Bhagwana Ram Meghwanshi, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of 701, Shanti Nagar, Behind Durgapura Railway Station, Jaipur (Raj). ----Appellant Versus 1. Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer Through Its Secretary. 2. Assistant Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer (Raj.). 3. Visheshadhikari, (U.i.d.), Department Of Information Technology And Communication (Doitc), I.t. Bhawan, Yojna Bhawan Parisar, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Neeraj Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Govind Gupta Mr. Hardik Singh, AAAG HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 29/06/2026 1. Mr. Govind Gupta, learned counsel enters appearance and takes notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2. 2. Mr. Hardik Singh, learned counsel enters appearance and takes notice on behalf of respondent No.3. 3. Service is treated as complete. 4. No reason has come forward for filing of this appeal after delay of 232 days. [2026:RJ-JP:23688-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-773/2025] 5. On perusal of the application, we do not find any reason coming forward and merely it is stated that the delay is bona fide, whereas we find that in relation to appointments for the year 2013, this appeal has been filed belatedly after 232 days. 6. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed on the ground of delay. 7. All pending application shall also stand dismissed. (MANEESH SHARMA),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ SANJAY KUMAWAT/RAJAT/54