1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.487 of 2026 Date of Decision: 08.05.2026 ___________________________________________________ Bhag Chand Thakur ....Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar and others …Respondents ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Parkash Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the Department has rejected the representation of the petitioner. 3. In this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. Notice discharged 4. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to assail the consideration order in accordance with law, if he is still aggrieved. The petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) May 08, 2026 Judge (V. Himalvi)