1 2026:CGHC:9083 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 1811 of 2026 Anjesh Kumar Verma S/o Late Ashwani Verma Aged About 25 Years (As Per Fir), R/o Village Ganiyari, P.S. Kota, District Bilaspur, C.G. ... applicant(s) versus The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Sho To PS Kota, District Bilaspur C.G. ... Respondent(s) For applicant (s) : Ms. Shital Soni, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. Palak Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 20.02.2026 1. The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 0037/2026, registered at Police Station Kota, Dist- Bilaspur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2026.02.20 18:23:42 +0530 2 the Excise Act. 2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the police of Police Station Kota, District – Bilaspur (C.G.), received an information from the informant and on the basis of the said information conducted a raid at the residence of the applicant in Verma Mohalla, Ganiyari and seized 60 liters of illicit handmade Mahua liquor (stored in 04 yellow plastic containers of 15 liters each) from the possession of the applicant. Thereafter, Police has registered an aforesaid offence against the present applicant. 3. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the present applicant has no previous criminal antecedents under the Excise Act. He further submits that under Section 34(2) of the Excise Act, minimum punishment is one year and maximum punishment is three years, and the applicant is in jail since 15.01.2026 and the trial is likely to take some time for its conclusion, therefore, he prays for grant of regular bail to the present applicant. 4. On the other hand, the learned State counsel opposes the bail application and submits that the charge-sheet has already been filed before the competent Court. He further submits that from the possession of the present applicant 60 liters of illicit handmade Mahua liquor was seized, therefore, he is not entitled for grant of regular bail. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the 3 case-diary. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the applicant and the fact that the applicant has no previous criminal antecedents under the Excise Act and also considering the fact that the charge-sheet has been filed and he is in jail since 15.01.2026 and conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, therefore, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the present applicant. 7. Let applicant, Anjesh Kumar Verma, involved in Crime No. 0037/2026, registered at Police Station Kota, District – Bilaspur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the Excise Act, be released on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against 4 him under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. Office is directed to provide a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice sagrika