Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 92498 (MAD)

Anand M v. The Superintendent of Police

WP(MD)/9340/2024 · 2026-01-06

S Srimathy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD)No.9340 of 2024 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.01.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P.(MD)No.9340 of 2024 M.Anand ... Petitioner vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2. The State Rep. By, The Sub Inspector of Police, Thalaivaipuram Police Station, Virudhunagar District, 3. The Inspector of Police, Economic Offence Wing, Virudhunagar District. 4. S.Selvaraj 5. S.Palanisami 6. M.Ramsamy 7. M.Ayyasami 8. P.Lakshmanan 9. V.Ammaiappan 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.9340 of 2024 10. S.Kanagaraj 11.S.Manickam ...Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to enquire and take appropriate action against the respondents 4 to 11 for cheating the petitioner and many others on their Chit Fund Money as represented in petitioner's representation dated 26.07.2023. For Petitioner : M/s.Chamundi Bose For R1 to R3 : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad Government Advocate(Crl.Side) For R7 : Mr. C.Mari Chellaiah Prabhu For R4,R6,R8 to R11 : No Appearance. ORDER The present Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to enquire and take appropriate action against the respondents 4 to 11 for cheating the petitioner and many others on their Chit Fund Money as represented in petitioner's representation dated 26.07.2023. 2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.9340 of 2024 respondents 1 to 3 submitted that there is no such complaint received by them from the petitioner. 3.The accused have collected amount and issued promissory notes. The transaction may not be chit transaction. Hence, this Court is of the considered opinion that even though there is a receipt in the form of promissory note, it amounts to collecting deposit from the poor villages. Therefore, the official respondents shall consider the receipts which is in a form of promissory notes and conduct enquiry. 4.The petitioner is directed to submit a fresh complaint before the 3rd respondent within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Therefore, the official respondents shall conduct proper enquiry and take action as per law. 5.With the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs 06.01.2026 NCC : Yes / No (1/2) Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes TMG 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.9340 of 2024 To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2. The Sub Inspector of Police, Thalaivaipuram Police Station, Virudhunagar District, 3. The Inspector of Police, Economic Offence Wing, Virudhunagar District. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.9340 of 2024 S.SRIMATHY , J. TMG ORDER MADE IN W.P.(MD)No.9340 of 2024 DATED : 06.01.2026 (1/2) 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis