Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040008682024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/130/2026 Pesi Jilen Age: 55 Occupation : Address:Son of Late Gepe Jilen resident of Ese Kerte Village PO and PS Liromoba West Siang District Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS Nyamar Karbak Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Son of Late Tumnya Karbak resident of Dego Kamki village PO and PS Kamba West Siang District Arunachal Pradesh ------------ Advocate for : Romjir Rakshap Advocate for : Marto Kato appearing for Nyamar Karbak: Advocate appearing for respectively. Linked Case :Election Pet./6/2024 Nyamar Karbak Son of Late Tumnya Karbak, resident of Dego Kamki village, PO and PS Kamba, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS Page No.# 2/3 Pesi Jilen Son of Late Gepe Jilen, resident of Ese Kerte Village, PO and PS Liromoba, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Marto Kato, Nyali Sora,M Tanga,Jumge Karbak,KeekeLoya Advocate for the Respondent : Romjir Rakshap, Takom Roleng,Bomnya Kamdak BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER Date : 02.07.2026 Heard Mr. Romjir Rakshap, learned counsel for the applicant/ returned candidate. Also heard Mr. Marto Kato, learned counsel for the Opposite Party/election petitioner. 2. The present application has been filed under Order VI Rule 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking amendment of the connected interlocutory application being IA(c)155(AP)2025. 3. The applicant/returned candidate has now specifically set-out the amendment proposed to be carried-out in paragraph Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 & 9; append 2(two) documents in paragraph Nos. 5 & 6; as well as the prayer portion of the connected interlocutory application being IA(c)155(AP)2025. 4. Mr. Kato, learned counsel for the Opposite Party/election petitioner, fairly submits that in view of the order passed by the Court today in the connected interlocutory application being IA(c)135(AP)2026, allowing the applicant/returned candidate to carry-out the proposed amendments, he has no objection if the proposed amendments, as noted-above, is allowed. Page No.# 3/3 5. Accordingly, the application is allowed. 6. The applicant/returned candidate is permitted to carry-out the amendments, more particularly, the paragraph Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 & 9; appending 2(two) documents in paragraph Nos. 5 & 6; as well as amending the prayer portion of the connected interlocutory application being IA(c)155(AP)2025, in terms of the amended application; within a period of 1(one) week from today. The amended IA(c)155(AP)2025, shall form a part of the record. 7. With the above, the interlocutory application, accordingly, stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant