Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9245 (RAJ)

DR. MOHAN SINGH MEENA S/O SHRI KANWAR LAL MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/11048/2026 · 2026-07-03

Rekha Borana

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:24818] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11048/2026 URN: CW / 24572U / 2026 1. Dr. Mohan Singh Meena S/o Shri Kanwar Lal Meena, Aged About 50 Years, R/o V And P - Vajheda, Teh. Hindaun City, Karauli, Raj. 2. Suresh Kumar S/o Shri Danaram, Aged About 46 Years, R/o V And P- Dhandhela, Teh. - Nohar, Dist. Hanumangarh, Raj. 3. Dr. Harshita Mali D/o Shri Anil Kumar Mali, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 4, Shabri Colony Main Road, Ayad (Rural), Udaipur, Raj. 4. Shalesh Kumar Dadhich S/o Shri Giriraj Prasad Dadhich, Aged About 49 Years, R/o 82A, Baran Road, Jai Hind Nagar, I Block C, Police Line, Nayapura, Kota, Raj. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Commissioner, College Education, Shiksha Sankul, Jln Marg, Jaipur. 3. Principal, Government Girls College, Katkad, Dist. Karauli, Raj. 4. Principal, Government College, Shri Vijaynagar, Sriganganagar, Raj. 5. Principal, Late Shri Gurusharan Chabra Government College, Suratgarh, Raj. 6. Principal, Government Agriculture College, Rajsamand, Raj. 7. Principal, Government Girls College, Bundi, Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Sobha Sharma for Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chinmaya Saxena, Asst.GC. Mr. Jitendra Takar & Ms. Ritika Naruka, AAAG for Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA Order 03/07/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue is governed by the Division Bench Judgment of this Court (Jaipur) in [2026:RJ-JP:24818] (2 of 2) [CW-11048/2026] D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 903/2023; State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Ram Chaturvedi & Ors. (decided on 19.09.2025). 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Department does not refute the above fact. He submits that the petition be disposed of in light of the same directions as issued in Ram Chaturvedi (supra). 3. In Ram Chaturvedi (supra), the Court directed as under :- “…….we deem it just and proper to dispose of these appeals and modify the judgment dated 23.08.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge as follows:- (1) The respondent/original petitioner/applicants are entitled to continue on their respective posts till they are replaced by existing regular employees or regularly selected candidates through RPSC. (2) The respondents/original petitioners/ applicants would be continued on their posts provided that sufficient number of students are available for the particular courses(s) for which they were appointed. (3) The respondents/original petitioners/ applicants would be entitled to honorarium at the rate of Rs.800/- per hour as is being paid to them presently or to be modified by the State from time to time. With the above modification, the present appeals are disposed of.” 4. The present writ petition is disposed of on the same terms and conditions as above. 5. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (REKHA BORANA),J 13/KASHISH