Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9244 (BOM)

KADAM SANJAYKUMAR SHIVRAJ AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

WP/12333/2026 · 2026-09-15

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

{1} wp12333-26.doc drp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.12333 OF 2026 Kadam Sanjaykumar Shivraj and Others PETITIONERS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. Sambhaji G. Munde, Advocate for the Petitioners Mrs. Saie S. Joshi, AGP for Respondent - State Mr. Vinayak Solanke, Advocate for Respondents No.5 to 7 ....… AND WRIT PETITION NO.12422 OF 2026 Munjaram Bapurao Mundhe and Others PETITIONERS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. Sambhaji G. Munde, Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. B. B. Bhise, AGP for Respondent - State Mr. Vinayak Solanke, Advocate for Respondents No.5 to 7 ....… [CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, & ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. J.] DATE : 15 th SEPTEMBER, 2026 ORDER : 1. The Petitioners are seeking selection grade. Their representations / proposals are pending with Respondent No. 5 - Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Parbhani. 2026:BHC-AUG:42686-DB {2} wp12333-26.doc 2. We have heard learned AGPs, who waive service of notice for Respondent Nos.1 to 4 and Mr. Solanke, learned Advocate for Respondent Nos. 5 to 7. 3. These Writ Petitions are disposed of by directing Respondent No. 5 – Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Parbhani to decide representations / proposals filed by the Petitioners (Annexure “A” of the Petitions) on their own merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within a period of eight weeks from the date fo receipt of copy of this order. [ ABASAHEB D. SHINDE ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE JUDGE drp/wp12333-26.doc