Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9244 (AP)

BODDU SATYAM, PALAKONDA [V], SRIKAKULAM DIST. v. JAMPA LAKSHMI, SAGARA [V], VISAKHAPATNAM DIST., & ANR.

CRLA/156/2010 · 2026-08-31

Alapati Giridhar

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010633012010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE 1st DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 156 OF 2010 Between: 1. BODDU SATYAM, PALAKONDA [V], SRIKAKULAM DIST., S/o. Late Gangayya R/o. Main Road, Palakonda Village, Post & Mandal in Srikakulam District. ...Petitioner AND 1. JAMPA LAKSHMI SAGARA V VISAKHAPATNAM DIST ANR, W/o. Madhu Sudhana Rao R/o. Sagara Village, Dumbiriguda Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Public Prosecutor High Court, Hyderabad. ...Respondents Appeal under Section 372/374(2)/378(4) of Cr.P.C praying that the High Court may be pleased to to present this Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Appeal to this Hon'ble Court against the Judgment of the Judicial I Class Magistrate, Palakonda, in C.C. No. 139 of 2008, dated 11th day of November, 2009. IA NO: 1 OF 2009(CRLAMP 3061 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant special leave to file an appeal against the Judgment of acquittal in C.C. No. 139 of 2008 on the file of the Judicial I Class Magistrate, Palakonda. Counsel for the Petitioner: D SANGEETHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following order: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR The Court made the following JUDGMENT: 1) This appeal is filed by the Complainant against the Judgment passed by the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Palakonda, dated 11.11.2009 in C.C.N.139 of 2008, assailing the acquittal of the Accused under Section 138 of NI Act. 2) The learned counsel for the Appellant submits that notice on Appellant is returned as he expired. He also filed memo to that extent. 3) Thus, recording the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the Appellant, the Appeal is disposed as abated. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR Dated: 01.09.2026 SM 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR Criminal Appeal No. 914 of 2009 Date: 01.09.2026 SM