[2026:RJ-JP:24490] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9522/2026 URN: CRLMB / 17664U / 2026 Jaswant Singh S/o Sachidanand Singh, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Kachrawata, Thana Nagarfort District Tonk. Rajasthan (Presently Confined In Central Jail Tonk Since 04/06/2026) ---Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Bhardwaj with Mr. Aayush Malik & Mr. Abhishek Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP Ms. Priyanka on behalf of Mr. O.P. Jhajharia HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 02/07/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 13.06.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge Uniara, in Criminal Misc. Case (CIS) No.141/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.32/2026, Police Station Nagarfort, District Tonk for the offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) 340(2) & 61 (2) of the BNS 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 04.06.2026. He further submits that the correction order dated 10.01.2024, on the basis of which the land was recorded in the petitioner's khatedari, has already been set aside by the competent authority vide order dated 17.04.2026. [2026:RJ-JP:24490] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-9522/2026] 3. Learned counesl for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner had assailed the order dated 17.04.2026 before the Board of Revenue, Ajmer (hereinafter referred to as "the BoR"), and stay order was granted in the revision petition, the petitioner is willing to withdraw the said revision petition. He further submits that the petitioner shall not challenge the order dated 17.04.2026 in future. He also submits that if the land is restored and recorded in the name of the earlier party, as it stood prior to the correction order dated 10.01.2024, the petitioner shall have no objection if the order dated 17.04.2026 is complied with. 4. However, learned counsel submits that the petitioner reserves all other rights and remedies available under law, including the right to institute an appropriate civil suit or revenue suit for adjudication of his rights with regard to the disputed land before the Competent Court. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the co- accused Shubham Suhal has already been enlarged on bail by the learned Trial Court itself. Moreover, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 6. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 7. Learned counsel for the complainant also opposes the bail application. However, she could not refute the fact that the correction order dated 10.01.2024, which is alleged to have been obtained by cheating, has already been set aside by the competent Court vide order dated 17.04.2026. She also could not [2026:RJ-JP:24490] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-9522/2026] refute the fact that the petitioner has already moved an application to withdraw his revision petition against the order dated 17.04.2026. 8. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 9. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon a consideration of the facts and circumstances, and particularly the fact that the investigation/trial will take considerable time and that the Competent Authority has already set aside the order dated 10.01.2024 vide order dated 17.04.2026; the petitioner has expressed his willingness not to challenge the said order any further and has already filed an application before the BoR, Ajmer, seeking withdrawal of the revision petition, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted. 10. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely-Jaswant Singh S/o Sachidanand Singh arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.32/2026, Police Station Nagarfort, District Tonk, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions: [2026:RJ-JP:24490] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-9522/2026] (i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; (iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (BIPIN GUPTA),J Sudha/133