APHC010433452023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] MONDAY, THE 7th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION NO: 22443/2023 Between: 1. VENNA NAGENDRAMMA, W/O (LATE) BALA KOTIREDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O. DOOR NO.2-155, ALAVALA VILLAGE, ROMPICHARLA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GUNTUR RANGE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , PALNADU DISTRICT, NARASARAOPET, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ROMPICHARLA POLICE STATION, ROMPICHARLA, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NARASARAOPET RURAL POLICE STATION, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. P BAKTAVASTALA REDDY, , S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. CIRCLE INSPECTOR, NARASARAOPET RURAL POLICE STATION, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR 2 DISTRICT. 7. PAMMI PEDA VENKATESWARA REDDY VENKATESWARA REDDY, S/O RAMAKOTIREDDY, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. DOOR NO.4-18, ALAVALA VILLAGE, ROMPICHARLA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT. 8. ONTIPULI VENKATESWARLU, S/O YEDUKONDALU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. DOOR NO.8-6, NUDURUPADU VILLAGE, PHIRANGIPURAM MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 9. PULI ANJIREDDY, S/O VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. DOOR NO.4-2/1, DONDAPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT. 10. POOJALA RAMAIAH RAMUDU, S/O NASARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. DOOR NO.8-6, ALAVALA VILLAGE, ROMPICHARLA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 5th respondent not properly investigated into FIR No.18 / 2023, dated 02-02-2023 on the file of the Rompicharla Police Station punishable under Section 452, 302, 109, 120B r/w 34 IPC, Section 25(1)(A) and 27 of ARMS Act is as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violate the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to handover the investigation in FIR No.18/2023 on the file of the Rompicharla Police Station, to impartial agencies like CBI or Crime Branch of Andhra Pradesh Police, and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 5th respondent not to take any steps in all respects in FIR No.18/ 3 2023 on the file of the Rompicharla Police Station, Rompicharla, Palnadu District, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass such IA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 2" and 3rd respondents to conduct departmental enquiry against the 6th respondent in the capacity of the 5th respondent for not conducting proper investigation and not file charge sheet in FIR No.18/ 2023 on the file of the Rompicharla Police Station, as procedure contemplated under the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH VIDYASAGAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. CH VIDYASAGAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 4 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION No: 22443 OF 2023 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this matter became infructuous and requested to dismiss the petition as infructuous. 2. Recorded the said submission. 3. In the result, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM, J 07.09.2026 Vns