Ms. Lalnunmawii v. The State of Mizoram and 11 Ors.
WP(C)/77/2026 · 2026-07-02
Rajesh Mazumdar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9239 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9239 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/4 GAHC030004402026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/77/2026 Ms. Lalnunmawii D/o Sh. Lalrammuana R/o Serkawn, North Lunglei, Lunglei, Mizoram
VERSUS The State of Mizoram and 11 Ors. R/b Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram, MINECO, Khatla, Aizawl, Mizoram 2:The Secretary Planning and Programme Implementation Department
3:The Secretary Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforems (DPandAR) (GSW)
4:The Mizoram Public Services Commissions (MPSC)
5:The Secretary Mizoram Public Services Commission (MPSC)
6:The Controller of Examination Mizoram Public Service Commission (MPSC)
7:Sh. Remruatfela
8:Sh. K. Vanlalhruaitluanga
Page No.# 2/4 9:Smt. Ashley Lalremruati
10:Smt. Lalrinmawii
11:Smt. Lalrotlingi
12:Sh. K. Vanlalpekhlu Advocate for the Petitioner : Mrs. H Lalmalsawmi Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA, Mizoram for R 1-3
B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER 03.07.2026
Heard Mrs. H. Lalmalsawmi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. J.C. Lalnunsanga, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 4-6 and Ms. Linda L. Fambawl, learned Addl. AG for respondent Nos. 1-3. 2. This matter had been listed yesterday i.e., 02.07.2026, when a submission had been made on behalf of the State that the appointment orders had been issued and the selected private respondents had also joined their respective post on 07.05.2026. 3. Today, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that on the
Page No.# 3/4 basis of additional affidavit filed today itself, that the respondent No. 8 had tendered his resignation from the post of the Junior Grade of Mizoram Planning, Economic & Statistical Service with effect from the date of the notification itself, and therefore the said post had now fallen vacant. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner had submitted that since the petitioner is vying for one of the post, at this stage if the vacancy created by the resignation of the respondent No. 8 is allowed to be filled up by the respondent authorities by appointing any candidate in the panel list, the petitioner may suffer irreparable loss. 5. The copy of the additional affidavit has been served upon the counsel appearing for the State and also upon the learned counsel appearing for the MPSC. 6. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. 7.
In the interest of justice, it is provided that in the event the post which has fallen vacant upon the resignation of the respondent No. 8 from the post of Junior Grade of Mizoram Planning, Economic & Statistical Service has not been filled up till date, the same shall not filled up from any candidate of the panel list, without liberty from the Court. Page No.# 4/4 List as directed by the earlier order dated 2.7.2026. JUDGE Comparing Assistant