SAMAY JI H.A. MAHAVIDYALAYA v. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR
W.P.(C)/6081/2026 · 2026-05-05
Jasmeet Singh
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9236 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9236 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~78 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6081/2026 SAMAY JI H.A. MAHAVIDYALAYA ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rishabh Kumar, Adv. versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Rupal, Mr. Hardik Rupal, Ms. Aishwarya Malhotra, Ms. Tripta Sharma, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R % 05.05.2026 CM APPL. 29953/2026 Exemptions granted, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of.
W.P.(C) 6081/2026
1. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers:-
“(i) issue a writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ, order or direction directing the Respondents to issue revised recognition order for 100 Seats of B.Ed. Course to the Petitioner institution under NCTE Regulations, 2014; and/or (ii) issue direction/order holding that the recognition granted to the petitioner for B.Ed. course continues to be in operation under the NCTE Act and the petitioner be treated as a recognized institution for all purposes and the respondents be
directed to take all consequential steps including correcting This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/05/2026 at 13:08:32
the status of petitioner institution as a recognized institution on their 21 website and to inform the affiliating body and the Department of Higher Education, Government of Uttar Pradesh enabling the petitioner to conduct the B.Ed. Course as well as participate in counselling & admit students for the academic session 2026-27 and onwards. ...”
2. The facts are that the petitioner submitted documents in the prescribed proforma to NRC for compliance of NCTE Regulations, 2014 seeking revised recognition for 100 seats. The said representation is pending
consideration by the respondent No. 1.
3. My attention has been drawn to an Order dated 16.05.2025 in W.P(C) 5765/2025 wherein in somewhat similar circumstances the coordinate bench allowed the petition directing the respondents to consider the request of the petitioner.
4. Accordingly, on the basis of parity, it is directed that the respondent shall decide the request of the petitioner institution for issuance of revised recognition of petitioner institution for 100 seats expeditiously and preferably within 8 weeks from today.
5. The petition is disposed of in aforesaid terms.
JASMEET SINGH, J MAY 5, 2026/AS This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/05/2026 at 13:08:32