Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2026 DAILYLAW 9236 (BOM)
NAILESH JOGESHWAR CHINCHOLKAR AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. ITS SECY., THR. RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPT., MUMBAI AND OTHERS
WP/4260/2021 · 2026-09-21
body2026
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9236 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9236 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 wp 4260.21 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 4260 OF 2021 ( Nailesh Jogeshwar Chincholkar and others ..vs.. State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Rural Development Department, Mumbai and others ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. Anand Deshpande, Counsel for the petitioners, Mr. N.R. Patil, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 to 4.
CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE & NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ.
DATED : 21 st SEPTEMBER, 2026
The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that, due to the passage of time, the reliefs sought in the petition have become infructuous.
2. In the wake of the aforesaid statement, the petition stands
disposed of as infructuous. (Nivedita P. Mehta, J.) (Anil L. Pansare, J.) adgokar 2026:BHC-NAG:12451-DB Signed by: MR. P.M. ADGOKAR Designation: Senior Pvt. Secretary Date: 21/09/2026 15:01:37