Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9232 (CAL)

PRITHWISH KUMAR MANDAL v. SUCHETA PRAMANICK SAHOO

CPAN/1659/2024 · 2026-04-16

Amrita Sinha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

44 16.04.2026 Ct. No.18 pg. IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE CPAN 1659 of 2024 in WPA 909 of 2024 Prithwish Kumar Mandal v. Smt. Sucheta Pramanick Sahoo Mr. Biswajit Das … For the alleged contemnor 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner at the time of call. 2. Learned advocate representing the alleged contemnor submits, upon instruction that, the order of the Court has been complied with. 3. A report filed by the Pradhan of the Janka Gram Panchayat indicating the manner in which the complaint filed by the petitioner has been dealt with, handed over in Court today by the learned advocate representing the alleged contemnor be retained with the records. 4. The signature of the petitioner in proof of receipt of the same is annexed with the documents filed by the learned advocate representing the Gram Panchayat. 5. The contempt application stands dismissed for default. 6. All parties shall act on the basis of a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Amrita Sinha, J.)