Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9230 (RAJ)

ASHA DEVI, W/O SATISH KUMAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

SOSA/529/2026 · 2026-07-02

Bhuwan Goyal, Inderjeet Singh

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:24563-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 529/2026 URN: SOSA / 1010U / 2026 In D.B. Criminal Appeal No.519/2025 Asha Devi, W/o Satish Kumar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Mandholi. Presently Pritampuri, Ps Sadar, Neem Ka Thana, Dist. Sikar. (At Present Appellant Is Confined In Seekar Jail) ----Appellant/Accused Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anirudh Tyagi Mr. Saurabh Vaishnav Mr. Pramod Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, Addl.GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 02/07/2026 1. This suspension of sentence application has been filed by the present accused-applicant along with the appeal. 2. Counsel appearing on behalf of the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has been sentenced to undergo life imprisonment for the offence under Section 302/120- B IPC. 3.Counsel for the accused-applicant has annexed the certificate under Rule 311 (3) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules to the effect that accused-applicant was on bail during trial. Counsel further submits that the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in this matter. Counsel further submits that accused applicant is a [2026:RJ-JP:24563-DB] (2 of 2) [SOSA-529/2026] lady and she was on bail during trial. Counsel further submits that hearing/disposal of appeal is likely to take long time. Therefore, he prays that sentence awarded to the accused-applicant may be suspended and the accused-applicant be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal. 4.Learned Additional Government Advocate opposed the application for suspension of sentence. 5.We have heard counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6.Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case and also considering the fact that applicant is a lady; she was on bail during trial and also considering the fact that hearing/disposal of appeal is likely to take long time, we deem it just and proper to suspend the sentence of the present accused-applicant during the pendency of the appeal. 7. In that view of the matter, this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the accused-applicant shall remain suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeal and accused-applicant be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that the accused-applicant shall appear before this Court on 04.08.2026 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so. 8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax for necessary compliance. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Anu/29