Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9228 (ALL)

M/S HARIOM INDUSTRIES LIMITED v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/32004/2026 · 2026-09-22

Vivek Saran

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32004 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. Heard Sri Akhil Agnihotri, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.3 to decide the Partition Suit Case No. 44493/2025 bearing Computerized No. T202503410144493 (M/s Hariom Industries Ltd. Vs. Anand Shukla and Other) filed by the petitioner 19.11.2025 under section 116 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code 2006 before respondent no.3 within stipulated time bound period as may be determined by this Hon'ble Court under the facts and circumstances of the case. B. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and restraining the private respondents from changing the nature of land property in question situated over Gata Nos. 854, 855 and 856, situated at Village Bhauti, Parganą and Tehsil Sadar, District Kanpur Nagar till the disposal of suit bearing no. 44493/2025 bearing Computerized No. T202503410144493 (M/s Hariom Industries Ltd. Vs. Anand Shukla and Other) filed by the petitioner on 19.11.2025 under section 116 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 filed by the petitioner for partition of legal share of petitioner in the aforesaid property." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the partition suit was filed by the petitioner, which is pending for the last six months and even notice for appearance to the private respondents was published pursuant to the order dated 18.12.2025 but still the case is not being heard and prays for expeditious disposal of the same. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhil Agnihotri Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Hari Narayan Singh M/S Hariom Industries Limited .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. Learned Standing Counsel does not have any objection to the prayer so made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. In such view of the matter, the instant petition is disposed of directing the respondent no. 3 to decide Partition Suit Case No. 44493/2025 bearing Computerized No. T202503410144493 (M/s Hariom Industries Ltd. Vs. Anand Shukla and Other), expeditiously, preferably within a period of one year from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after hearing all concerned, provided there is no legal impediment. September 23, 2026 gp WRIC No. 32004 of 2026 2 (Vivek Saran,J.) Digitally signed by :- GANESH PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad