Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9226 (ALL)

ASHOK KUMAR PATEL v. MANISH KUMAR VERMA, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND 4 OTHERS

CAPL/6706/2026 · 2026-09-23

Vikas Budhwar

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 6706 of 2026 Court No. - 53 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. The present contempt application has been preferred alleging willful defiance of the order dated 06.10.2025 passed in PIL No. 2933 of 2025, wherein general directions were issued to the State, its officials and functionaries to remove the obstructions and hindrances and illegal encroachments. 2. On a pointed query being raised to the learned counsel for the applicant whether the applicant happens to be a party to the said proceedings, the applicant alleges that the judgment / order referred to above has not been complied with and he is non-party in the said proceeding. 3. In the opinion of the Court, it is for the applicant to file a Public Interest Litigation or take any remedy which is permissible in law, in case encroachments are there and there is laxity on the side of the opposite parties in removing the encroachments or illegal constructions in that regard. 4. At this juncture, learned counsel for the applicant submits that liberty be accorded to him to take legal remedies as available under law. 5. Accordingly, the contempt application stands consigned to record, leaving it open to the applicant to take legal remedies as available under law. September 24, 2026 N.S.Rathour Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Baleshwar Dayal, Surendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Ashok Kumar Patel .....Applicant(s) Manish Kumar Verma, District Magistrate And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad