HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 38685 of 2026 Court No. - 38 HON'BLE VINOD DIWAKAR, J. 1. Heard counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel representing the State-respondents. 2. The present writ petition has been preferred for issuance of a direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.2 Member, Board of Revenue, Circuit Court, Agra to decide the petitioner's Revision No.158 of 2026, under Section 56(1)(a) of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, within stipulated time. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that aforesaid revision has been pending consideration before respondent no.2, but no final decision or adjudication has been made thereon till date. Therefore, a suitable direction be issued to respondent no.2 to decide the aforesaid revision expeditiously, within a stipulated time. 4. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the present writ petition is finally disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 Member, Board of Revenue, Circuit Court, Agra to decide the petitioner's Revision No.158 of 2026, under Section 56(1)(a) of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, within a period of three weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. It is also observed that if the one third of the amount has been deposited by the petitioner, the recovery certificate issued against the petitioner shall be kept in abeyance. September 24, 2026 A. Tripathi Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arpit Malviya, Awadhesh Kumar Malviya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Vinod Diwakar,J.) M/S Vasundhara Circle Old Gt Road Infront Of Hanuman Mandir .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AKHILESH TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad