Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9222 (KAR)

SRI.GOPAL, v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/7575/2026 · 2026-04-01

Sachin Shankar Magadum

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17858 WP No. 7575 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 7575 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI.GOPAL, S/O MUNIISWAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RAJANAKAUTNE VILLAGE, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI, YALHANAKA TALUK, BANGALORE560 064 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJANNA C.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, M.S.BUILDING, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001. Digitally signed by CHAITHRA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17858 WP No. 7575 of 2026 3. THE KARNATAKA MILK FEDERATION, KMF COMPLEX, MARIGOWDA ROAD, BENGALURU-560029, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR 4. THE BENGALURU URBAN, BENGALURU RURAL AND RAMANAGARA DISTRICT'S CO-OPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS UNION LTD., MARGOWDA ROAD, BENGALURU-560029, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WP UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS FILED PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR APPROPRIATE WRIT WHICH IS APPLICABLE AND QUASH THE ANNEXURE B, DATED- 17-02-2026 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.4 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17858 WP No. 7575 of 2026 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been amicably settled out of Court and therefore, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present appeal. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. In view of the said memo, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE AMM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 60