Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9217 (AP)

SYED SURAJ A v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLRC/130/2023 · 2026-08-31

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010082952023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY, THE 1st DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Nos: 130 & 1037 of 2023 Crl.R.C.No.130 of 2023 Between: 1. SYED SURAJ A, S/O S.M. HUSSAIN, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O PLOT NO.301, LOTUS REDIDENCY, LALMMA GARDENS, MANIKONDA, HYDERABAD ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI 2. DILSHAD, W/O SYED SURAJ, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, NOW UNDER THE CARE AND CUSTODY OF HER FATHER ABDUL SALEEM, R/O D.NO.44-1-25/4, BESIDE LANE RAMGOPAL THEATER, GUNADALA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATA MOHAN RAO PATHAKOTA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2 Crl.R.C.No.1037 of 2023 Between: 1. SYED SURAJ, , S/O. HUSSAIN, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, 2. SYED HUSSAIN,, S/O. IMAM, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, 3. SYED BILKIS,, W/O. HUSSAIN, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 4. SYED SADIQ,, S/O. HUSSAIN, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF PLOT NO.301, LOTUS RESIDENCY, LALAMMA GARDENS, MANIKONDA, HYDERABAD ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SMT DILSHAD, W/O. SYED SURAJ, D/O. ABDUL SALEEM, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, RIO. D.NO.44-1-25/4, GUNADALA, VIJAYAWADA 520 004 2. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATHI ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. VENKATA MOHAN RAO PATHAKOTA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Smt. Nanilu Naidu, learned Counsel is appointed as learned Mediator in these cases and has submitted mediator’s report. 3 In view of the mediator’s report, the Criminal Revision Cases are disposed of as compromised. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 01.09.2026 VTS