SANJAY BHOLA AND OTHERS v. UNION TERROTORY OF CHANDIGARH AND ORS
CRM-M/4726/2026 · 2026-02-18
Mandeep Pannu
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9214 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9214 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.246 Date of Decision: 18.02.2026 ...Petitioners Versus
....Respondents CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present:- Mr. Ashwani Verma, Advocate for for the petitioners. Mr. Satish Kumar, Addl. P.P., U.T. Chandigarh for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Arjun S. Rai, Mr. Anuraj Arora and Ms. Sukrit Rai, Advocates for respondent No.3. ***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral) Mr. Arjun S. Rai, Mr. Anuraj Arora and Ms. Sukrit Rai, Advocates, have made appearance on behalf of respondent No.3 and filed Power of Attorney, which is taken on record. Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Jagroop Singh Hooda, submits that the complaints have been duly considered and consigned, and has placed the relevant document on record. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of as having become infructuous, with liberty granted to the complainant to approach the appropriate forum, if so permitted under law.
(MANDEEP PANNU) 18.02.2026 JUDGE Anu Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ANU 2026.02.19 13:42 I am the author of this document Chandigarh