1 2026:CGHC:18756 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5625 of 2021  Dile Ram Khare S/o Shri Chawan Narayan Khare Aged About 54 Years R/o Village Pamgarh, Tahsil Pamgarh, District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Police Station And Post Office, Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Director Directorate Of Panchayat, Indravati Bhawan, Police Station And Post Office Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Lailunga, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Ramlal Rajak, Advoate on behalf of Mr. Atul Kesharwani, Advocate For State : Ms. Anuradha Jain, Dy. G.A. For Respondent No. 3 : Ms. Chetna Sharma, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Satish Gupta, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board 23.4.2026 1) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after dismissal of WPS No. 643 of 2009, a representation was made by petitioner Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2026.04.23 17:13:25 +0530 2 before Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Lailunga on 15.11.2019 as he was acquitted in criminal case but till date said representation has not been decided. 2) On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the respondents would oppose. They submit that order of appointment issued in favor of petitioner was canceled on the ground of suppression of material facts as there was criminal record against petitioner which was not disclosed. They further submit that this petition is misconceived and deserves to be dismissed. 3) I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 4) Taking into consideration the fact that writ petition filed by the petitioner against cancellation of his appointment has already been dismissed vide order dated 13.2.2009, no order can be passed in favor of petitioner with regard to reinstatement. However, petitioner would be at liberty to pursue his pending representation. 5) Accordingly, this petition stands disposed. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE A j i n k y a