Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9208 (GAU)

Mayur Drai and 9 Ors v. The State of AP and 2 Ors

WP(C)/301/2026 · 2026-07-01

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC040010162026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/301/2026 Mayur Drai and 9 Ors Son of Shri Bakli Drai, Loiliang Village, PO Loiliang, Lohit District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Thayem Mepo Age: Occupation : Son of Late Kanupin Mepo Loiliang Village PO Loiliang Lohit District Arunachal Pradesh. 3: Sutik Krisikro Age: Occupation : Son of Late Mayapsa Krisikro Village Telluliang PO Tezu Lohti District Arunachal Pradesh. 4: Soti Tayang Age: Occupation : Son of Late Chotong Tayang Loiliang Village PO Loiliang Lohit District Arunachal Pradesh. 5: Bakli Drai Age: Occupation : Son of Late T Drai Page No.# 2/4 PO Loiliang Lohit District Arunachal Pradesh. 6: Behemso Tayang Age: Occupation : Son of Shri Soti Tayang PO Loiliang Lohit District Arunachal Pradesh. 7: David Mepo Age: Occupation : Son of Shri Thakpem Mepo PO Loiliang Lohit District Arunachal Pradesh. 8: Chowaim Tayang Age: Occupation : Son of LAte Nilalum Tayang PO Hucheliang (Loiliang) Lohit District Arunachal Pradesh. 9: Nihul Drai Age: Occupation : Son of Late B Drai Loiliang Village PO Loiliang Lohit District Arunachal Pradesh. 10: Stephen Krisikro Age: Occupation : Son of Shri Sutik Krisikro Telluliang Village PO Tezu Lohit District Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS Page No.# 3/4 The State of AP and 2 Ors through the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Lohit District Tezu Arunachal Pradesh. 3:Khogen Boo Age: 0 Occupation : Head Gaon Bura cum Chairperson Verification Board Loiliang Village PO Tezu Lohit District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Debo K Deori, Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 02.07.2026 Mr. D. K. Deori, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to file afresh, as certain subsequent developments have taken place after filing of this writ petition. Mr. N. Ratan, learned Additional Advocate General for the State respondents, is present. The prayer for withdrawal is accepted. Page No.# 4/4 Accordingly, writ petition stands closed on withdrawal with a liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant