Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9204 (CAL)

MRITYUNJOY GHOSH AND ANR v. IFTIKARUDDIN SARDAR BLLRO HINGALGANJ AND ANR

CPAN/1337/2025 · 2026-04-16

Aniruddha Roy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. 38 16.4.2026 (Item No. 3) (AB) In the High Court at Calcutta Special Civil Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.P.A.N. 1337 of 2025 in W.P.A. 17894 of 2024 Mrityunjoy Ghosh & Anr. VS Iftikaruddin Sardar, The Block Land and Land Reforms Officer, Hingalganj, Hingalganj BDO Office Campus, Hingalganj, North 24 Parganas, West Bengal – 743435 & Anr. Mr. Arjun Samanta …. For the petitioners Mr. Sk. Md. Galib, Sr. Advocate Ms. Priyamvada Singh …. For the alleged contemnor no. 1 Mr. Soumitra Bandyopadhyay, Sr. Govt. Adv. Mr. Priyabrata Batabyal …. For the alleged contemnor no. 2 This contempt proceeding arising from an order dated December 4, 2024. Mr. Arjun Samanta, learned advocate appears for the petitioners. Ms. Priyambada Singh, learned advocate led by Mr. Md. Galib, learned Senior Government advocate appears for alleged contemnor no. 1. Mr. Priyabrata Batabyal, learned advocate appears for the alleged contemnor no. 2. The learned advocates for the alleged contemnors submit that, they have performed their obligations and carried out the direction of this Court. The petitioners had also confirmed the same. 2 Mr. Soumitra Bandyopadhyay, learned Senior advocate has submitted the compliance report on behalf of the alleged contemnor no. 2 in the form of affidavit, the same has been taken on record. The compliance report shows that the reasoned order has already been communicated to the jurisdictional SDO. Following the direction of this Court since the order has been communicated to the SDO, this Court expects that the jurisdictional SDO shall do the needful in the light of the order made by this Court dated December 4, 2024. However, if the jurisdictional SDO does not take steps the petitioner shall be at liberty to take steps in accordance with law. With the above observations and since nothing further survives in this contempt proceeding, CPAN 1337 of 2025 stands dropped and closed. The application being CPAN 1337 of 2025 stands disposed of. (Aniruddha Roy, J.)