Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9199 (AP)

MADDIPATI VIMALA SAROJINI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLRC/1299/2024 · 2026-08-31

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010570422024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY, THE 1st DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1299/2024 Between: 1. MADDIPATI VIMALA SAROJINI, W/O SUBBA RAO, D/O NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 35YRS, OCC UN-EMPLOYEE, R/O D.NO.5-165, NEAR MPP SCHOOL, DOMMERU VILLAGE, KOVVUR MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI. 2. MADDIPATI SUBBA RAO, S/O V.V.SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O 2-63, RAMALAYAM STREET, CHANDRAVARAM, CHAGALLU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KATRAGADDA SIRI SWATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PARIMI RAMA RAYUDU 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: 2 ORDER Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Sri Shaik Mohammed Ismail, learned Counsel is appointed as learned Mediator in this case and has submitted mediator’s report. In view of the mediator’s report, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as compromised. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 01.09.2026 VTS