HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 39266 of 2025 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. Heard Sri Yash Pandey, holding brief of Sri Sudhanshu Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri B.P. Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Raghvendra Pratap Rajan, learned counsel appearing for the first informant appointed by the High Court Legal Services Committee. 2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 74 of 2024, under Section 302 IPC and Section 4/25 Arms Act, Police Station Bhaluani, District Deoria, during the pendency of the trial. 3. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case.It is further submitted that as per the report submitted by the trial Court, only four witnesses, out of 26 witnesses proposed to be examined have been examined and trial is not likely to be concluded in near future. It is also submitted that the applicant has been languishing in jail since 29.4.2024 and he is having no criminal history. It is lastly submitted that in case the applicant is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. Per contra, learned counsel for the first informant and learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts, however, it is submitted that the applicant inflicted stab wound on the deceased who intervened in a quarrel between the applicant Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sudhanshu Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Raghvendra Pratap Rajan Arun Kumar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) and his father and the deceased succumbed to the said injuries. 5. As per the allegation in the FIR, a quarrel took place between the applicant and his father and when deceased intervened in the said quarrel, being enraged the applicant inflicted him stab wound on his abdomen and chest as a result of which, the deceased succumbed to the said injuries. As per the report submitted by the trial Court, only four witnesses, out of 26 witnesses proposed to be examined have been examined and it appears that trial is not likely to be concluded in near future. It is also submitted that the applicant has been languishing in jail since 29.4.2024 and he is having no criminal history. 6. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of the accused and taking into account overcrowded jails and heavy pendency of criminal cases before the trial courts as well as considering the mandate of the judgement of the Apex Court in the case of Kapil Wadhawan vs Central Bureau of Investigation reported in 2025 SCC OnLine SC 3038 as well as guideline of this Court in the case of Maya Tiwari Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2024 SCC Online All 6765 regarding grant of bail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 7. Accordingly, the present application is ALLOWED. 8. Let the applicant- Arun Kumar involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (ii) The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. BAIL No. 39266 of 2025 2 (iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. (iv) The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 9. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 10. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. Verification of mobile number and Aadhaar card of the applicant as well as sureties should be verified by the court concerned. 11. It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant. 12. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the applicant through concerned Jail Superintendent via e-mail or e-prison portal within 24 hours in compliance of the order of the Apex Court in the case of Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail, In Re: Suo Motu Writ Petition (Crl.) No.4 of 2021 decided on 31.01.2023 reported in (2024) 10 SCC 685. 13. However, the learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial of the case as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of one year and the applicant is directed to cooperate in the trial. September 24, 2026 Abhishek BAIL No. 39266 of 2025 3 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad