1 ( 2026:HHC:16030 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 423 of 2026 Decided on: 12.05.2026 ________________________________________________ Kamlesh Kumari ....Petitioner Versus Dr. Amarjeet K. Sharma …Respondent _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar Verma, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 11.05.2026 alongwith copy of Office Order of even date, wherein, it has been stated that representation of the petitioner has been considered and decided by the respondent-department by way of passing a detailed order. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:16030 ) 2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the matter is closed. 3. However, the petitioner is at liberty to assail the consideration order, in accordance with law, if she is still aggrieved. 4. The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 12th May, 2026 Judge (raman)