Karikalan v. The State rep by, The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/8653/2026 · 2026-04-07
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9190 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9190 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.8653 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 07.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.O.P.No.8653 of 2026
1. Karikalan, S/o.Banudhasan
2. Sivaraj, S/o.Chinnathambi ... Petitioners Vs. State by the Inspector of Police, Thalaivasal Police Station, Salem District. (Crime No.56/2026) … Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in Crime No. 56 of 2026 pending investigation on the fille of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.E.Kannadasan For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 27.02.2026 for the alleged offence under Sections 296(b), 103(1) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No.56 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.8653 of 2026
2. The case of the prosecution is that the deceased had relationship with the 1st petitioner’s paternal uncle’s wife. When this was questioned by the petitioners, there was a wordy quarrel and the petitioners allegedly attacked the deceased with stone and screw driver. Hence, the present case has been registered.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case and that they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 27.02.2026 and they are ready to co-operate with the investigation and abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioners.
4. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent Police strongly opposed the grant of bail to the petitioners, reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the investigation is still in preliminary stage. Hence, he opposed the grant of bail to the petitioners. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.8653 of 2026
5. Considering the totality circumstances of the case and also considering the nascent stage of the investigation, this Court is of the view that it is an inappropriate time to consider this bail application.
6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 07.04.2026 mp To 1.The Inspector of Police, Thalaivasal Police Station, Salem District.
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.8653 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. mp Crl.OP.No.8653 of 2026 07.04.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis