Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9190 (ALL)

SANJAY KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/28897/2026 · 2026-09-22

Vivek Saran

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 28897 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. Heard Sri Sanjay Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Prem Bahadur Singh holding brief of Sri R.P. Shukla, learned Counsel for the respondent no. 4. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following relief:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2 to decide Case No. RST/2247/2026 Computerised Case No. T202615060402247 (Sanjay Pathak versus State of U.P. filed under section 209(Ja) U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously in view of the demarcation report dated 4.5.2025 submitted by Revenue Inspector, Awdah Khas, Azamgarh within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for expeditious disposal of the case, which is stated to be pending since long. 4. Learned Standing Counsel representing the State has no objection to the same. 5. In such view of the matter, the instant writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent no. 2 to decide Case No. RST/2247/2026 Computerised Case No. T202615060402247 (Sanjay Pathak versus State of U.P.) within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, provided there is no legal impediment. September 23, 2026 gp Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kumud Kumar, Sanjay Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rameshwar Prasad Shukla (Vivek Saran,J.) Sanjay Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GANESH PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad