Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9186 (GAU)

Voterson Moyong and 4 Ors v. Audesh Kumar Singh and 3 Ors

Cont.Cas(C)/19/2026 · 2026-06-28

Kardak Ete

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040007742026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/19/2026 Voterson Moyong and 4 Ors Son of Shri Onik Moyong, resident of Village Mirku Dapi, PO and PS Pasighat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Miloko Ering Age: Occupation : Son of Shri Talung Ering resident of Mirbuk PO and PS Pasighat East Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 3: Okang Perme Age: Occupation : Son of Late Alom Perme resident of Village Tigra PO and PS Pasighat East Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 4: Obang Siram @ Tabang Siram Age: Occupation : Son of Late Takut Siram PO and PS Pasighat East Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 5: John Siram Age: Occupation : Son of Shri Takut Siram resident of Village Mowb-II Page No.# 2/3 Itanagar PO and PS Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS Audesh Kumar Singh and 3 Ors Secretary, Land Management, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:Pagli Sora Age: 0 Occupation : Director Land Management Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar 791111 3:Smti Sonalika Jiwani (IAS) Age: 0 Occupation : the Deputy Commissioner East Siang District Pasighat Arunachal Pradesh. 4:Smti Anju Dupak Age: 0 Occupation : the District Land Revenue and Settlement Officer East Siang District Pasighat Arunachal Prades Advocate for the Petitioner : Kemo Lollen, Tojum Tao,Arun Yun,Maryum Sora,Geli Taye,D Ado Advocate for the Respondent : Elina Perme, Nima Norbu,Minter Karbak BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 29.06.2026 Heard Mr. M. Sora, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. N. Norbu, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 2 and Ms E. Page No.# 3/3 Perme, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 3 and 4. The alleged wilful disobedience and violation is in respect of an interim order dated 09.04.2026 passed in WP(C) No. 106(AP)/2026. However, the WP(C) No. 106(AP)/2026 having been disposed of by an order dated 26.06.2026, the interim order automatically stands merged along with the main order passed on 26.06.2026. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant