[2026:RJ-JP:24574] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9570/2026 URN: CRLMB / 17774U / 2026 Ajay @ Chandu S/o Shri Mahaveer Gurjar, R/o Dhonde Ka Pura, Police Station Sadar Badi, District Dholpur. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 02/07/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 221/2020 registered at Police Station Badi Sadar, District Dholpur, for offence(s) under Sections 147, 148, 149, 332, 353, 307, 400 & 216-A of IPC and Sections 3, 25 of Arms Act, 1959 and Section 11 of RDAA Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the present matter pertains to bail jump. After getting benefit of bail, the accused-petitioner went out of State to earn his livelihood and he could not appear before the learned Trial Court on the concerned date and as such, on 21.08.2024, his bail bonds were forfeited. Learned counsel further submits that the accused- petitioner is in judicial custody since 17.05.2026. Learned counsel also undertakes that the accused-petitioner shall appear before [2026:RJ-JP:24574] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9570/2026] the learned Trial Court on each and every date as fixed by the Court and the accused-petitioner shall not make any attempt to jump the bail again, therefore, in the interest of justice, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and also the undertaking of the learned counsel on behalf of the accused-petitioner that the accused-petitioner shall appear on each and every date as fixed by the learned Trial Court. Hence, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and accused-petitioner Ajay @ Chandu S/o Shri Mahaveer Gurjar is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. However, it is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of bail granted by this Court. The accused-petitioner is further directed to mark his presence in the concerned police station once in a month, till trial is concluded. 7. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the accused-petitioner, as directed above. In [2026:RJ-JP:24574] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9570/2026] case the accused-petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 8. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 9. It is made clear that in case of further misuse of liberty of bail, subsequent prayer of bail on behalf of accused-petitioner shall not be considered. 10. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 11. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J PUNEET KUMAR/106